Tag Archives: technology policy

Research from ESMT Berlin suggests data partnerships with big tech benefit niche enterprises

A new study has found that specialist firms can increase their profits by sharing data with large technology competitors. Rather than weakening their position, this kind of collaboration can actually turn rivals into partners, easing competition and creating shared value. The research shows that data, when used strategically, can help smaller firms protect their market space while allowing bigger players to benefit from improved efficiency and product quality.

The study, “The Strategic Value of Data Sharing in Interdependent Markets,” was written by David Ronayne, Assistant Professor of Economics at ESMT Berlin, along with Hemant Bhargava from UC Davis, Antoine Dubus from ETH Zurich, and Shiva Shekhar from Tilburg University. Published in the journal Management Science, it models how data collected in one market can enhance products in another. The authors describe this effect as a “cross-market externality,” meaning that data in one area can indirectly improve performance elsewhere.

According to the researchers, when a specialist firm shares its valuable data with a large, generalist competitor, both sides can benefit. The generalist, now reliant on the specialist’s data, becomes less likely to compete aggressively in the specialist’s primary market. This creates a relationship the authors call “co-opetition,” where companies remain competitors but also cooperate to mutual advantage. The generalist gains from better product development, while the specialist enjoys reduced competition and more breathing space.

“Our findings reveal a surprising logic,” says Ronayne. “By making a generalist dependent on the specialist’s data, both firms profit. The specialist secures a more stable position in its market, while the generalist saves money and time on innovation.” The study challenges the usual belief that firms should guard their data at all costs, suggesting instead that strategic sharing can create win–win outcomes when managed carefully.

The authors identify several lessons for business leaders. Sharing data can make competition with larger firms less intense and improve profitability for smaller companies. Generalists, too, can increase their profits when they cooperate across markets. And for firms considering entering a new market, data-sharing agreements can serve as powerful bargaining tools. In this way, the study offers a fresh perspective on how firms of different sizes can coexist in data-driven industries.

This research is particularly relevant today, as major technology firms like Google and OpenAI expand into new areas to gain access to valuable data sources. For smaller players under pressure from such giants, the study provides a new playbook: collaboration may sometimes be a more innovative, more sustainable strategy than confrontation. However, Ronayne warns that firms must think about long-term effects, such as mergers, acquisitions, and the potential for weaker competition to harm consumers. The message is clear: data sharing can be profitable—but it must be done with foresight and responsibility.

More information: David Ronayne et al, The Strategic Value of Data Sharing in Interdependent Markets, Management Science. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2024.04938

Journal information: Management Science Provided by ESMT Berlin

Ministers Pressed to Address Inequality in Access to Green Technologies such as Solar Power and Electric Vehicles

According to a recent study from the University of Sheffield, to achieve its ambitious net-zero emissions goals by 2050, the UK government must do more than offer subsidies for low-carbon technologies (LCTs) like electric vehicles and solar panels. Developed in collaboration with researchers from the universities of Nottingham and Macedonia, the report highlights significant socioeconomic disparities limiting uptake among disadvantaged groups despite overall increasing adoption.

In recent years, the number of UK households using solar panels for electricity generation has more than doubled, from 3 per cent to 6.5 per cent. Similarly, solar heating technology adoption rose from 1.4 per cent to 2.1 per cent, and electric or hybrid vehicle usage increased from under 1 per cent to 2.8 per cent. These trends indicate growing national acceptance of low-carbon technologies, yet socioeconomic inequalities remain a considerable barrier.

The study identifies age, education, occupation, ethnicity, and gender as significant influences individuals’ ability to invest in these technologies. Dr Andrew Burlinson from the University of Sheffield’s School of Economics highlighted that current policies inadequately support disadvantaged groups, exacerbating existing inequalities and limiting their resilience to fluctuating energy prices.

The UK government currently subsidises some electric vehicles at purchase, but these subsidies are rarely linked to socioeconomic status, and support for domestic solar installations ended in 2019. The researchers argue that targeted financial and educational incentives must be reintroduced, primarily aimed at lower-income communities, to ensure equitable access and help achieve national decarbonisation targets.

Professor Monica Giulietti from the University of Nottingham advocates for broader, community-level initiatives beyond individual households, particularly in private, rented, and social housing sectors. Community-based solar installations could substantially reduce individual financial burdens, improving accessibility for those without direct control over their housing or transport.

Dr Jayne Carrick from the South Yorkshire Sustainability Centre reinforced the necessity for comprehensive policy reforms, highlighting survey findings that nearly half of residents are reluctant to adopt solar panels, and 57 per cent hesitate regarding heat pump technologies. Dr Burlinson concluded that targeted policies addressing socioeconomic inequalities are essential for fairness and enhancing household energy efficiency and resilience during the transition to a sustainable future.

More information: Andrew Burlinson et al, Socioeconomic inequality in low-carbon technology adoption, Energy Economics. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108244

Journal information: Energy Economics Provided by University of Sheffield

When Should New Technologies Be Introduced?

New research conducted by Bayes Business School (formerly Cass) demonstrates that being at the forefront of technology alone is insufficient for market success. However, the strategic timing of product launches can harness opportunities and build credibility for firms, offering a promising path to success. Dr. Thomas Robinson, Senior Lecturer in Marketing at Bayes, and Dr. Ela Veresiu, Associate Professor of Marketing at the Schulich School of Business, York University, Toronto, spearheaded this study. They have crafted a framework to guide organisations in pinpointing the most favourable situations for launching products.

The research delineates four distinct timing scenarios that marketing managers might encounter. Understanding the characteristics of each scenario enables firms to devise a launch strategy aimed at success. The scenarios include synergistic timing, where the market and stakeholders are primed for new products, epitomising an ideal launch condition. Flexible timing involves minimal coordination by the firm but a high readiness for change among stakeholders. This timing could evolve into synergistic if the firm decides to release a product early or engage stakeholders by gradually releasing information or sharing setbacks.

In contrast, inflexible timing presents a challenging scenario where stakeholder resistance to change necessitates a proactive approach by the firm to foster an appetite for new technology. This might involve simplifying the technology or enhancing user-friendliness to transition towards a more favourable timing. Antagonistic timing, where low stakeholder readiness and firm coordination are the least favourable conditions for launching new technology.

The paper references the unsuccessful 2013 launch of Google Glass to illustrate the pitfalls of poor timing. The product was introduced before the firm was ready, and consumers were willing to embrace its functionality, which led to significant backlash. In contrast, a decade later, the market conditions have evolved to favour the acceptance of similar technologies, such as Ray-Ban’s Meta Smart Glasses, highlighting the importance of appropriate timing.

This study underscores that launching new technology is a nuanced social interaction, and timing plays a crucial role in effectively engaging stakeholders. Providing sufficient time shows respect and consideration, while more timing can help stakeholders understand and accept new technology.

This research draws from a wide array of sources, including the Business Source Complete database and numerous high-ranking marketing journals, and is supported by an extensive review of the literature on market legitimacy and timing. This comprehensive approach allowed the researchers to identify prevalent themes and insights on timing, which is crucial for firms aiming to enhance their launch success rates.

Despite introducing 30,000 new products annually, a staggering 95 per cent fail, illustrating the critical nature of timing. The research parallels various life scenarios where timing impacts outcomes, such as relationship dynamics and social etiquette. These examples underscore the pervasive influence of timing norms across different contexts, from product launches to political marketing and the fashion cycle.

Dr. Robinson highlights that while marketers often perceive technology adoption as a straightforward replacement of old with new, the reality is more complex. Technologies that initially fail may re-emerge successfully in what are termed ‘phoenix markets’. Examples include smartwatches, electric cars, and social media platforms that initially failed but later found success. Understanding and applying effective timing strategies could prevent substantial losses and contribute to the revival of previously unsuccessful technologies, offering a valuable learning opportunity for marketers.

To conclude, the timing framework developed through this research not only aids in launching new technologies but also has broader applications across various fields, such as rebranding, mergers, and service design. This illustrates the widespread relevance and potential impact of strategic timing in diverse market dynamics.

More information: Thomas Derek Robinson et al, Timing Legitimacy: Identifying the Optimal Moment to Launch Technology in the Market, Journal of Marketing. DOI: 10.1177/00222429241280405

Journal information: Journal of Marketing Provided by City St George’s, University of London

Ensuring Worker Involvement for Public-Interest Industrial Policies

A recent study underscores the critical role of involving workers and broader societal stakeholders in shaping Brazilian industrial policies to meet national development goals and serve the public interest. Researchers highlight that sectors like animal protein often prioritise corporate welfare over societal benefits due to limited involvement from civil society and labour unions in policy formulation and execution.

Analysis of industrial policy initiatives dating back to the mid-1990s reveals a direct correlation: policies that integrated input from labour unions and civil society demonstrated greater effectiveness. Government initiatives that imposed stricter conditions on private sector involvement demanding reciprocal societal contributions, yielded more favourable outcomes.

For instance, agreements within the meat industry, where labour unions held less influence and government funding primarily bolstered corporate growth, resulted in global competitiveness but limited gains for the public good. Conversely, sectors like automotive, where labour unions exerted more influence, saw policies align more closely with national development objectives, including targets for technological innovation and employment stability.

Published in the journal Development and Change, the study by Renato H. de Gaspi of Central European University and Pedro Perfeito da Silva of the University of Exeter underscores the significance of stakeholder engagement in shaping industrial policies across various sectors. It reveals substantial differences in policy outcomes influenced by the strength of labour unions and societal pressures.

Dr Perfeito da Silva emphasises the risk of industrial policies devolving into corporate welfare, advocating for inclusive policy discussions to ensure alignment with broader societal goals. He asserts that amidst global economic shifts, effective industrial planning must avoid business capture of state resources and instead leverage diverse stakeholder input.

Reflecting on historical shifts, the study notes that during Luis Inácio Lula da Silva’s presidency, increased influence from union leaders countered business dominance in policy negotiations, advocating for improved working conditions and greater nationalisation of production chains. This period highlighted the transformative potential of incorporating non-business stakeholders in policy deliberations.

Looking ahead, the study observes a resurgence of stakeholder-driven policymaking under Lula’s new administration, evidenced by mission-oriented industrial policy initiatives with specified conditions and metrics. However, these initiatives still require further specification and rigorous implementation to translate past lessons into current developmental efforts effectively.

More information: Renato H. de Gaspi et al, The Sectoral Politics of Industrial Policy Making in Brazil: A Polanyian Interpretation, Development and Change. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12835

Journal information: Development and Change Provided by University of Exeter

Having more does not necessarily mean having better

In the logistics industry, multiple delivery routes to the same destination enhance reliability. Similarly, in the realm of network-dependent consumerism, the resilience and efficiency of digital consumption rely on the presence of multiple interconnected networks operating harmoniously.

The shift towards digital platforms as the standard business model underscores the perils of depending solely on a single network and a limited number of operators.

A team of researchers, including members from Kyoto University, has delved into the dynamics between consumers who use only one platform (single-homing) and those who engage with multiple platforms (multi-homing). What sets this study apart is the development of a novel analytical framework, a unique tool to assess whether a greater proportion of multi-homing consumers could significantly improve efficiency by merging two business platforms.

Takanori Adachi, from Kyoto University’s Graduate School of Management and Economics, highlighted the study’s connection to the economics of imperfect competition. This area of study, increasingly vital with the progression of information and communication technology, delves into various market-related challenges.

In scenarios where consumers opt for single-homing, the chosen platform invariably assumes a dominant position. However, as the trend towards multi-homing gains traction, it becomes imperative to steer policy directions towards the complexities of digital regulation. This shift is driven by a larger share of consumers embracing multiple platforms, a trend that this study aims to shed light on.

Moreover, Mark Trembley from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, pointed out that the growing prevalence of multi-homing necessitates more significant reductions in consolidation costs for businesses. It also elevates entry barriers for new entrants in the platform market.

As the prevalence of multi-homing increases, Susumu Sato from Hitotsubashi University underscores the need for competition regulators to be particularly vigilant. In multi-homing contexts, they must be alert to the potential negative impacts of platform mergers and the creation of entry barriers, a challenge that this study aims to address.

The research community often needs help with the challenge of limited data on platform-based businesses.

Takanori Adachi expressed satisfaction with how the study, leveraging economic theoretical models and public databases, succeeded in providing a more lucid understanding of platform economics’ functioning in real-world scenarios. This approach underscores the critical role of theoretical and empirical research in navigating and understanding the complexities of modern digital marketplaces.

More information: Takanori Adachi et al, Platform Oligopoly with Endogenous Homing: Implications for Mergers and Free Entry, Journal of Industrial Economics. DOI: 10.1111/joie.12345

Journal information: Journal of Industrial Economics Provided by Kyoto University