Author Archives: support

Study Reveals Impact of Extreme Weather on Mortgage Payments

When cyclones and floods strike populated areas, people’s ability to meet mortgage payments varies significantly depending on the severity and type of extreme weather, recent research suggests. The study found that more powerful cyclones increase the likelihood of borrowers missing or delaying mortgage payments. Similarly, heavy rainfall, especially in flood-prone coastal regions, heightens the risk of defaulting on payments or discouraging early mortgage repayment.

As climate change exacerbates the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, the role of this research in enhancing predictive capabilities becomes increasingly crucial for major financial institutions and borrowers alike. Researchers from the University of Edinburgh analyzed data from nearly 70,000 mortgages and over 3.5 million individual payments to assess how heavy rains and tropical cyclones impact mortgage risk in Florida, USA. By combining detailed mortgage characteristics and payment histories with meteorological data, they aimed to empower lenders with better predictive capabilities regarding payment defaults and early mortgage repayments.

Their findings highlight that the intensity of tropical cyclones significantly affects the likelihood of borrowers defaulting on their payments. For instance, hurricanes of category three or higher more than doubled the probability of default compared to category two storms. Additionally, the study revealed that heavy rains in flood-prone areas reduce the likelihood of borrowers opting for early mortgage repayment. However, tropical cyclones themselves did not significantly influence this behaviour.

These outcomes carry negative consequences for both lenders and borrowers. Defaulting damages borrowers’ credit scores, while early repayment affects lenders’ expected cash flows, according to the researchers. The study’s innovative credit scoring models, incorporating weather-related variables, demonstrated a notable improvement in predicting mortgage defaults and prepayments. Professor Raffaella Calabrese from the University of Edinburgh Business School stressed the importance of systematically integrating weather-related risks into credit risk assessments. She underscored that such adaptations are essential for accurately assessing the evolving risks posed by extreme weather events.

The research underscores the critical necessity for financial institutions to adapt their risk assessment frameworks to include the growing impact of climate change-induced extreme weather events on mortgage payments and loan behaviours. This proactive approach not only enhances predictive accuracy but also strengthens resilience against future financial risks stemming from climate variability, making it a vital step for the financial industry.

More information: Raffaella Calabrese et al, Impacts of extreme weather events on mortgage risks and their evolution under climate change: A case study on Florida, European Journal of Operational Research. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.11.022

Journal information: European Journal of Operational Research Provided by The University of Edinburgh

Enhanced Methodology Empowers AI in Detecting Human Deception

A team of researchers has introduced a novel training tool designed to enhance artificial intelligence (AI) ‘s capabilities in recognising when humans provide deceptive information, particularly in scenarios involving economic incentives. The tool addresses a critical issue where individuals may falsify personal data, such as when applying for mortgages or seeking to lower insurance premiums.

As Mehmet Caner, co-author of the study and Thurman-Raytheon Distinguished Professor of Economics at North Carolina State University’s Poole College of Management, points out, AI systems are extensively used in business applications, such as assessing mortgage affordability and determining insurance premiums. These systems, which traditionally rely on statistical algorithms for predictive modelling, inadvertently create a space for individuals to manipulate information to their advantage, leading to the need for the development of more sophisticated AI tools.

The research aimed to adjust AI algorithms to better accommodate these economic incentives for deception. By developing a new framework of training parameters, the researchers enabled AI to adapt its learning process to identify situations where users may have motives to lie. This enhancement focuses on improving AI’s ability to anticipate and account for human behaviour influenced by economic incentives.

In simulated trials, the modified AI demonstrated improved accuracy in detecting inaccuracies in user-provided data. “This effectively reduces the incentive for users to provide misleading information,” Caner explains. Nevertheless, the study acknowledges the challenge of distinguishing between minor falsehoods and more significant deceptions, prompting further investigation into establishing clear thresholds.

The team is now making these cutting-edge training parameters available to the public, with a strong call to AI developers worldwide to embrace and refine their applications. Caner underscores that this advancement is a significant stride towards curbing the economic motivations for dishonesty in AI-interpreted contexts. The ultimate aim is to elevate AI systems to a level where they can potentially eliminate such incentives, thereby fostering greater trust and reliability in automated decision-making processes.

More information: Mehmet Caner et al, Should Humans Lie to Machines? The Incentive Compatibility of Lasso and GLM Structured Sparsity Estimators, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2024.2316102

Journal information: Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Provided by North Carolina State University

Unravelling Cryptocurrency Regulation through the Legibility Framework

Since its inception, the governance of cryptocurrencies has emerged as a contentious issue on the global financial stage. While some nations have meticulously crafted regulatory frameworks for these digital assets, others remain hesitant to intervene, with a few even opting for outright bans. Conventional wisdom posits that governmental bodies naturally seek to regulate markets to enhance oversight and stability. However, the stark discrepancies in cryptocurrency regulation worldwide challenge this assumption, transcending mere differences in financial market development and state capacity. This raises fundamental questions: What factors underpin these disparities? What motivates regulatory actions in financial markets?

Associate Professor Jack Seddon from Waseda University’s School of Political Science and Economics and Associate Professor Miles Kellerman from Leiden University’s Institute of Security and Global Affairs, in their innovative research, introduce the concept of ‘legibility’ as a pivotal lens for analysing financial markets. This concept reframes the ongoing debate surrounding cryptocurrency regulation as a political struggle over whether private markets should be made ‘legible’ to the state. Their framework, which posits that this struggle hinges on two core variables: market demand for regulation and the state’s inclination to supply regulatory oversight, offers a fresh perspective on the complex dynamics of cryptocurrency regulation. Their findings, published in Business and Politics on February 5, 2024, and supported by The Law, Politics and Economics of Financial Benchmarks: JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20K13438, mark a significant contribution to the field.

In this novel analytical framework, the interplay between demand and supply determines distinct states of market legibility. On the demand side, diverse market actors vie for regulatory clarity, while the supply side gauges the state’s readiness to formalise oversight. When both demand and supply are low, markets exist in a pure illegibility devoid of formal regulations. Conversely, high demand and supply levels lead to collaborative legibility, where markets operate under clear regulatory frameworks.

Furthermore, when state supply exceeds market demand, contested legibility ensues. Here, the state seeks to regulate despite resistance from market participants. Conversely, contested illegibility arises when demand for regulation outstrips the state’s readiness to supply it. The framework also posits a temporal progression through these legibility states: most markets commence in pure illegibility, transitioning over time through contested phases to achieve collaborative legibility.

Applying this framework, Seddon and Kellerman analysed the evolution of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, European Union, and Japan. Their study revealed varying trajectories: the US navigates contested legibility, while the EU has progressed from contested to collaborative legibility. Japan notably advanced swiftly from pure illegibility to collaborative legibility. Importantly, their research suggests that once collaborative legibility is attained, markets tend not to regress.

The findings of this research not only underscore the broad applicability of the legibility framework beyond cryptocurrencies, but also offer practical insights into regulatory dynamics across diverse markets and jurisdictions. Future research aims to extend these insights to other sectors and countries, enhancing the framework’s robustness and generalisability. Dr. Kellerman, highlighting the study’s relevance, noted, “This research addresses critical regulatory challenges. For instance, prolonged periods of contested legibility in the cryptocurrency market may delay consumer protection regulations. By mapping contestation patterns over legibility, our framework provides a foundational understanding of the political economy of financial regulation, thereby contributing to the development of more effective and efficient regulatory policies.”

More information: Miles Kellerman et al, Into the ether or the state? Legibility theory and the cryptocurrency markets, Business and Politics. DOI: 10.1017/bap.2023.38

Journal information: Business and Politics Provided by Waseda University

A Suggested Reporting Mechanism to Mitigate Bank Runs

The recent collapses of Silicon Valley Bank and two other financial institutions, following panic-induced runs on deposits, have ignited a longstanding discourse in bank regulation: determining the delicate balance between transparency and discretion. Regulators necessitate comprehensive insight into a bank’s balance sheet to enable timely intervention before its demise. However, an excess of openness could trigger premature withdrawals from a salvageable institution, exacerbating the crisis it aims to avert.

Novel research from Texas McCombs has pinpointed a potential equilibrium: an “optimal reporting system” with the potential to forestall future financial tumult. As articulated by Ronghuo Zheng, associate professor of accounting, in this proposed framework, occurrences akin to the tumultuous events witnessed at Silicon Valley Bank and its counterparts would be rendered less probable or calamitous. A central bone of contention with the existing system lies in its adoption of fair-value accounting. This methodology appraises a bank’s assets at prevailing fair market values rather than initial costs.

Nevertheless, a notable exception exists within this paradigm: the non-mandatory disclosure of so-called HTM (Held-To-Maturity) securities at fair value. These encompass 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds intended for retention until maturity. Under this exemption, a bank reports a $100 T-bond at its face value of $100 despite potential fluctuations in its market worth. For instance, on February 13th, a $100 10-year T-bond was valued at $97.16, marking a loss of $2.84.

Typically, such losses remain confined to accounting entries since the bank harbours no intent to liquidate these bonds. However, in March 2023, Silicon Valley Bank was compelled to offload these securities to meet withdrawal demands from substantial depositors. This development triggered a domino effect, prompting additional withdrawals and further bond sales, ultimately culminating in losses amounting to $1.8 billion. This predicament might have been averted had the bank disclosed the market value of its bonds, asserts Zheng. Armed with such information, regulators could have preempted the unfolding crisis.

What does an optimal reporting system entail? Drawing on a prevalent bank-run model, Zheng and Gaoqing Zhang from the University of Minnesota concluded that an optimal system would highlight the riskiest banks while protecting less vulnerable ones from debilitating runs. Striking this balance involves requiring full disclosure under certain conditions but not under others. For example, banks experiencing paper losses on HTM securities would be required to disclose such losses, alerting regulators to potential distress.

Conversely, banks reaping paper gains on HTM securities could report them to reassure depositors, albeit up to a specified threshold. Each bank would be assigned its unique threshold, customised to its susceptibility to runs and its exposure to systemic shocks like economic downturns. Gains surpassing this threshold would remain unreported. Explaining the rationale behind setting a threshold for good news, Zheng elucidates that it’s a preventive measure to shield medium-risk banks from unnecessary panic. If some banks report substantial asset gains while others report moderate gains, depositors may question the latter’s stability despite their medium risk profiles. By capping the reporting of gains across all banks, Zheng’s framework homogenises perceptions of low- and medium-risk banks among depositors, safeguarding solvent institutions from unwarranted and destabilising runs. “We only want to report the very bad banks,” emphasises Zheng. “If you are not too bad, you can stay silent.”

More information: Gaoqing Zhang et al, Optimal Reporting Systems in Bank Runs, The Accounting Review. DOI: 10.2308/TAR-2021-0626

Journal information: The Accounting Review Provided by The University of Texas at Austin

Insights from Grocery Shopping Habits: A Gateway to Establishing Creditworthiness for Individuals Lacking Credit History

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning, along with the evolution of large-scale data storage, access, and processing technologies, have ignited interest among financial institutions in novel data reservoirs for credit scoring. These innovative sources encompass bill payment histories for phone, utility, and streaming services, transaction records from various financial accounts like checking, savings, and money market accounts, and rent payment histories. This interest is twofold — driven by the pursuit of profit, including the generation of new accounts, and the noble aim of enhancing social welfare by extending credit access to individuals devoid of conventional credit scores.

A recent study from the University of Notre Dame reveals that frequent visits to the grocery store might hold the key to demonstrating creditworthiness. Titled “Utilising Grocery Data for Credit Assessment,” the forthcoming research in Management Science by Joonhyuk Yang, Assistant Professor of Marketing at Notre Dame’s Mendoza College of Business, in collaboration with Jung Youn Lee from Rice University and Eric T. Anderson from Northwestern University, sheds light on this intriguing prospect.

The research team partnered with a multinational conglomerate operating in multiple cash-reliant, developing countries across Asia and Africa. The conglomerate, the data sponsor, owns a credit card issuer and a large-scale supermarket chain. This unique arrangement facilitated merging data from these two domains, enabling the observation of behaviours from a sample of 30,089 consumers.

Their methodology involved transforming raw data into a refined set of inputs while filtering out credit risk indicators embedded within grocery data. Yang explains, “Our approach was prompted by insights gleaned from discussions with the data sponsor’s manager, who stressed the need for a strategic summarisation of key data elements into meaningful variables. Merely inundating the problem with vast amounts of data sans structure is unlikely to yield results.” This sentiment echoes similar sentiments expressed by managers from leading U.S. banks, highlighting the challenge of efficiently leveraging extensive consumer data for loan decision-making.

The study found that recurrent grocery shopping habits provide discernible signals of credit risk. For instance, purchases of cigarettes or energy drinks correlate with a higher likelihood of missing credit card payments or defaulting. Conversely, buying ‘good’ or healthy groceries, such as fresh milk or vinegar dressings, is associated with consistent and timely credit card bill payments.

Drawing from a vast body of literature on habits, the researchers constructed variables measuring the consistency in consumers’ purchasing patterns. This approach was facilitated by the nature of grocery items as non-durable necessities, leading to frequent and recurrent choices by consumers.

Moreover, the study demonstrates that an individual’s grocery purchases can elucidate their payment behaviour, even after controlling for socio-demographic variables and credit scores. Yang elaborates, “Using item-level survey ratings, we found suggestive evidence that purchasing healthier yet less convenient food items predicts responsible payment behaviours. Additionally, there is a robust correlation between the consistency in various dimensions of grocery shopping and timely credit card bill payments.”

Furthermore, cardholders who consistently pay their bills on time exhibit particular behavioural patterns, such as shopping on the same day of the week, maintaining similar expenditure levels across months, and showing brand and product category loyalty.

Through simulations of hypothetical credit scoring and decision-making processes, the research team illustrates how grocery data can provide valuable insights into credit risk, leading to enhanced credit outcomes for deserving individuals and increased profitability for lenders. For instance, the inclusion of grocery data substantially enhances default predictive accuracy for individuals lacking credit scores, resulting in improvements ranging from 3.11 to 7.66 percentage points.

However, the study also identifies scenarios where the use of grocery data adds minimal incremental value, thereby underscoring the limitations of this new data source. Yang notes, “The incremental benefit of grocery data diminishes sharply when traditional credit scores or relationship-specific credit history are available.” These findings elucidate when lenders might find it advantageous to collect, acquire, and utilise alternative data sources.

These findings have profound implications for financial institutions. Leveraging grocery data for credit scoring presents an opportunity to tap into a vast, untapped market segment. By extending credit to consumers currently underserved by the traditional credit system, lenders can expand their customer base and enhance profitability while contributing to financial inclusion and social welfare.

More information: Jung Youn Lee et al, Using Grocery Data for Credit Decisions, Management Science. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3868547

Journal information: Management Science Provided by University of Notre Dame

Transforming Perspectives on Hiring through Socioeconomic Insights

A study of significant relevance to the current discourse on hiring practices, published by the American Psychological Association, reveals a shift in perspective across the political spectrum. It shows that both liberals and conservatives tend to perceive merit-based hiring as unfair after exposure to the ramifications of socioeconomic disparities. This finding, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, underscores a notable shift in perspective across the political spectrum regarding hiring practices.

Lead researcher Daniela Goya-Tocchetto, PhD, an assistant professor of organization and human resources at the University at Buffalo-State University of New York, underscores the profound impact of early socioeconomic disadvantages on educational attainment, test performance, and professional experiences. These insights into the undermining effects of inequality on equal opportunity are often overlooked in assessments of merit-based processes despite their crucial role in shaping individual trajectories.

The study, encompassing five online experiments with over 3,300 participants, reveals the influence of contextual information on perceptions of merit-based hiring and promotion. In two experiments, participants encountered scenarios depicting merit-based selection criteria, with half receiving additional details on socioeconomic advantages and disadvantages among candidates. This contextual information had a significant impact, with liberal and conservative participants perceiving the processes as less equitable and inclusive.

Further experiments revealed a consistent trend: participants became increasingly critical of merit-based hiring and promotion systems upon learning about low-income obstacles to educational and career advancement opportunities — moreover, familiarity with socioeconomic disparities led to heightened support for initiatives fostering socioeconomic diversity in hiring practices.

Notably, the absence of race as a variable in these experiments prompts reflection on potential divergences in findings had race been a focal point. Goya-Tocchetto acknowledges that previous research indicates white conservatives may react defensively to discussions of racial inequity. Nonetheless, while initially inclined to view merit-based processes favourably, conservative participants adjusted their perceptions when confronted with socioeconomic disparities.

The study’s implications extend beyond hiring practices, touching on broader debates surrounding diversity initiatives. While initiatives targeting racial diversity have often sparked controversy, programs addressing socioeconomic disparities may offer a less contentious pathway towards fostering inclusivity. Goya-Tocchetto suggests that such initiatives, while tackling socioeconomic inequalities, may indirectly contribute to addressing racial inequality, given the disproportionate impact of socioeconomic disadvantages on racial minorities.

Goya-Tocchetto advocates for a more holistic approach to candidate evaluation among hiring managers in navigating these complex dynamics. Acknowledging the far-reaching effects of socioeconomic inequalities on access to opportunities, she calls for reevaluating traditional hiring criteria to ensure a more equitable and inclusive selection process.

More information: Goya-Tocchetto et al, Can selecting the most qualified candidate be unfair? Learning about socioeconomic advantages and disadvantages reduces the perceived fairness of meritocracy and increases support for socioeconomic diversity initiatives in organizations, Journal of Experimental Psychology. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001525

Journal information: Journal of Experimental Psychology Provided by American Psychological Association

Protecting Against Later-Life Dementia: The Role of Cognitive-Stimulating Occupations

A recent study led by the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, the Columbia Aging Center, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health sheds light on the potential safeguarding effect of engaging in cognitively stimulating occupations during midlife against the onset of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in later years. This groundbreaking study, featured in Neurology, marks a significant departure from previous research by employing objective assessments rather than subjective evaluations to elucidate the correlation between occupational complexity and cognitive health outcomes.

The study, spearheaded by Vegard Skirbekk, PhD, professor of Epidemiology at Columbia Mailman School of Public Health and Columbia Aging Center, underscores the pivotal role of mentally challenging job tasks in preserving cognitive functioning throughout the ageing process. Trine Holt Edwin, the study’s first author from Oslo University Hospital, emphasises the critical importance of education and intellectually demanding professional environments in emphasising cognitive well-being in older individuals.

With a meticulous approach, the researchers leveraged data from the Norwegian administrative registry and occupational attributes sourced from the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) database. They examined over 300 occupations to gauge their cognitive demands across different stages of adulthood. The Routine Task Intensity (RTI) index, a proxy for occupational cognitive demands, was used, with lower RTI values indicative of more cognitively taxing job roles. By employing group-based trajectory modelling, the study identified distinct trajectories of occupational cognitive demands spanning participants’ occupational histories from their 30s through their 60s.

Subsequently, the researchers delved into the association between these trajectory groups and the incidence of clinically diagnosed MCI and dementia among participants in the HUNT4 70+ Study (2017-19). The analysis adjusted for various dementia risk factors, including age, gender, educational attainment, income, overall health status, and lifestyle habits.

The findings revealed a compelling inverse relationship between occupational cognitive demands and the risk of dementia in later life, even after accounting for potential confounders such as age, sex, and education. Specifically, individuals engaged in occupations characterised by high cognitive demands exhibited a significantly lower risk of dementia compared to those characterised in less cognitively demanding roles.

Trine Holt Edwin underscores the nuanced interplay between education and occupational complexity in influencing the risk of MCI and dementia, suggesting that both factors independently contribute to cognitive health outcomes. Yaakov Stern, the project’s principal investigator at Columbia University, highlights the study’s methodological advancements, particularly its reliance on registry data to elucidate occupational histories and cognitive demands.

The study’s authors, while presenting these compelling findings, also caution against inferring direct causation between occupational cognitive demands and dementia onset. They note the complexity of such associations and the need for further validation through rigorous longitudinal research. They acknowledge the study’s limitations, including the absence of granular distinctions between cognitive requirements within occupational categories and the dynamic nature of job responsibilities over time.

This groundbreaking study not only underscores the multifaceted influence of occupational cognitive demands and educational attainment on later-life cognitive health but also illuminates the protective effect of engaging in cognitively stimulating occupations during midlife. These findings, which have been published in a prestigious journal, offer valuable insights for policymakers, healthcare practitioners, and individuals alike, underscoring the imperative of fostering intellectually enriching work environments to mitigate the burden of age-related cognitive decline.

More information: Trine H. Edwin et al, Trajectories of Occupational Cognitive Demands and Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Later Life, Neurology. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209353

Journal information: Neurology Provided by Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health

Why Numerous Jobs Become Monotonous: Recent Study from MSU Reveals Significant Interest Disparities in the US Labour Market

A recent study at Michigan State University has unveiled significant disparities between individuals’ career interests and the demands of jobs in the United States. These disparities highlight a stark misalignment between the interests of the workforce and the requirements of the labour market, exposing a prevalent issue of unfulfilled interests among many workers.

Published in the Journal of Business and Psychology, this pioneering study diverges from traditional approaches by focusing on career interests rather than skills or knowledge. Drawing from a comprehensive national dataset comprising 1.21 million U.S. residents and national employment data from the U.S. Department of Labor, the research sheds light on the intricate dynamics of interest and job demand.

Lead author Kevin Hoff, an assistant professor in MSU’s Department of Psychology, underscores the significance of interest fit in predicting job performance and satisfaction. He notes that the findings reveal that a substantial portion of the workforce cannot maximise productivity and well-being due to a lack of alignment between their interests and job requirements. This emphasises the importance of individual interests, making the audience feel valued and recognised.

The study highlights “artistic” as the most prevalent interest among individuals, yet it comprises a mere 2% of available jobs. Conversely, despite being less favoured among individuals, “conventional” or systematic and detail-oriented work is in high demand within the job market.

Furthermore, the research unveils more significant interest gaps among individuals with lower levels of education, suggesting that higher education may offer more essential opportunities for achieving interest alignment in the workplace. Hoff emphasises the role of interests in driving knowledge and skill development, which are vital for the success of the labour force.

In light of these findings, the study advocates providing more comprehensive information regarding labour demands during career assessments. This call for action empowers individuals to explore careers that align with their interests and offer available job opportunities, giving them a sense of control over their career choices.

To ensure the robustness of their findings, the researchers compared job demands from 2014 and 2019 with projections for 2029, revealing consistent interest gaps across these time frames. As artificial intelligence continues to reshape the job landscape, researchers anticipate adjustments in the labour market. This potential for change offers hope, suggesting that the current disparities may not be permanent.

More information: Kevin A. Hoff et al, Interest Gaps in the Labor Market: Comparing People’s Vocational Interests with National Job Demands, Journal of Business and Psychology. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-024-09945-8

Journal information: Journal of Business and Psychology Provided by Michigan State University

Challenges Faced by U.S. Health Departments: Workforce Shortages and Struggles in Public Health Staffing

A recent study conducted by Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and Indiana University illuminates the unwavering dedication of U.S. health departments in their struggle to adequately staff their workforce and recruit new talent. Despite their relentless efforts, gaps persist in hiring a sufficient number of public health workers. The study, published in the June issue of Health Affairs, underscores the challenges these departments face.

The study identifies key barriers, such as insufficient funding, a scarcity of individuals with public health training, and a lack of visibility for careers in the public sector. However, it also highlights the immense potential of public health careers, which, if properly harnessed, can significantly contribute to the health sector. Lengthy hiring processes, though a challenge, can be overcome with strategic interventions.

Heather Krasna, PhD, associate dean of Career Services at Columbia Mailman School, underscores the urgency, noting the disparity between the number of graduates in the field and the demand for their skills in the workforce. Krasna emphasises the need for health systems to rethink their recruitment strategies and operational procedures to meet the evolving demands of public health effectively.

Despite enacting the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021, which aimed to provide additional funding to support workforce needs during the COVID-19 pandemic, many health departments still need help attracting new talent due to the limitations of their budget allocations. The disparity in salaries offered by the public sector compared to the private sector remains a significant challenge, further complicating recruitment efforts.

Moreover, the bureaucratic hurdles inherent in government hiring processes prolong the time it takes to fill vacant positions, with an average duration of 204 days compared to the much shorter timelines observed in the private sector. Civil service exams and other assessment requirements add to the complexity and inflexibility of the hiring process, dissuading potential candidates from pursuing careers in public health.

The study authors, including Valerie A. Yeager from Indiana University School of Public Health, propose a series of strategic interventions to address these workforce gaps. These include a comprehensive review of hiring procedures, decentralisation of control over the hiring process, converting temporary positions to permanent roles, adopting modern recruitment technologies, and enhancing financial incentives such as student loan repayment schemes. If implemented, these interventions can revolutionise the recruitment process and bridge the workforce gaps.

Additionally, increased investment in permanent funding for public health departments is called for to ensure long-term sustainability and effectiveness. By implementing these recommendations, governmental public health agencies can work towards closing the workforce gaps and better serving the population’s needs.

More information: Valerie A. Yeager et al, When Money Is Not Enough: Reimagining Public Health Requires Systematic Solutions To Hiring Barriers, Health Affairs. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00020

Journal information: Health Affairs Provided by Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health

Early Career Work Patterns and Long-Term Health Outcomes: Exploring the Impact Beyond the 9-5

Research conducted by Wen-Jui Han from New York University, US, and published on April 3, 2024, in the open-access journal PLOS ONE suggests that the hours individuals work in their younger years may have repercussions on their health decades later.

Numerous studies have consistently highlighted the detrimental effects of nonstandard work schedules, such as working outside the traditional nine-to-five workday, on both physical and mental health and social and family life. However, this study adopts a life-course approach to provide insights into how work schedule patterns throughout one’s career influence health outcomes in middle age.

Using data from The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth-1979 (NLSY79), which spans over 30 years and includes information on more than 7,000 individuals in the US, Han investigates whether employment patterns during younger adulthood are linked to sleep quality, physical health, and mental well-being at age 50.

Han’s analysis reveals that approximately a quarter of participants (26%) consistently worked stable standard hours, while another third (35%) primarily adhered to standard hours. Additionally, 17 percent initially followed standard hours in their 20s but later shifted to volatile working patterns involving evening, night, and variable hours. Twelve percent initially worked standard hours but later transitioned to variable hours; a final ten percent were unemployed primarily during this period.

Comparatively, individuals whose careers included more volatile work schedules experienced less sleep, poorer sleep quality, and a higher likelihood of reporting depressive symptoms by age 50, in contrast to those who predominantly worked traditional daytime hours throughout their working lives. Particularly noteworthy were the findings concerning individuals who maintained stable work hours in their 20s but shifted to volatile schedules in their 30s. This shift significantly impacted health outcomes, akin to the effects observed in individuals with educational attainment below the high school level.

Furthermore, Han’s research identifies racial and gender disparities in work schedules and health outcomes. For instance, Black Americans were more likely to have volatile work schedules associated with poorer health, underscoring how certain demographic groups may disproportionately bear the negative consequences of such employment patterns.

Han suggests that volatile work schedules contribute to poor sleep, physical fatigue, and emotional exhaustion, rendering individuals more susceptible to an unhealthy lifestyle. The study also indicates that work schedules’ positive and negative effects on health can accumulate over a lifetime, thereby exacerbating health inequities.

Han emphasises that work, which is traditionally viewed as a means to secure resources for a decent life, has now become a vulnerability to health due to the growing precarity in work arrangements within an increasingly unequal society. Moreover, individuals occupying vulnerable social positions, such as females, Black individuals, and those with lower levels of education, disproportionately bear the health consequences associated with volatile work schedules.

More information: Wen-Jui Han et al, How our longitudinal employment patterns might shape our health as we approach middle adulthood—US NLSY79 cohort, PLoS ONE. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300245

Journal information: PLoS ONE Provided by PLOS

Unveiling Vulnerability: Recognizing Individuals Prone to Burnout

It’s common for individuals to reach a breaking point in their professional lives, experiencing burnout for varying durations. Leon De Beer, an Associate Professor of Work and Organizational Psychology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Department of Psychology, along with colleagues from the Healthy Workplaces research group, has conducted a study shedding light on this phenomenon. Their research reveals that approximately 13 per cent of Norwegian employees are highly susceptible to burnout.

In response to this concerning statistic, De Beer’s team has embarked on a mission to develop a tool capable of identifying those at risk of burnout. Recognising the importance of early intervention, they’ve outlined vital indicators that may signal an impending burnout episode. These signs include mental exhaustion, diminished enthusiasm for work, difficulty concentrating, and occasional outbursts.

Early burnout detection is crucial in mitigating its detrimental effects, which can manifest physically and psychologically. Cardiovascular issues, musculoskeletal pain, sleep disturbances, and depression are among the potential consequences. Moreover, organisations may suffer from talent loss, increased absenteeism, and diminished productivity due to burnout.

To tackle this urgent issue, De Beer’s research group has developed the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), a powerful instrument for early detection of burnout risk. Currently undergoing trials in over 30 countries, this tool assesses four key risk factors: exhaustion, mental distancing, cognitive impairment, and emotional impairment. Its comprehensive nature and global reach make it a vital resource in the fight against burnout, empowering individuals and organisations to take proactive steps towards well-being.

Burnout, characterised by prolonged exposure to demanding circumstances, isn’t merely an illness but a state of profound physical and mental exhaustion. While typically associated with workplace stress, it’s acknowledged that work-life balance also influences burnout susceptibility. The repercussions of stress and burnout often extend beyond professional domains, permeating personal life and vice versa.

While burnout can persist for years if left unaddressed, the key to prevention lies in systemic interventions. Professor Marit Christensen from NTNU’s Department of Psychology underscores the necessity of fostering supportive work environments. She advocates for structural measures that protect employee well-being, emphasising that individual treatment alone may only prove effective with conducive workplace conditions. This approach instils hope, inspiring organisations to create environments that prioritise well-being.

A study involving 500 Norwegian workers revealed that approximately 13 per cent were at high risk of burnout, prompting the need for targeted interventions. While Norway fares relatively well in terms of mental health and work-related issues compared to the EU average, burnout remains a prevalent concern. The BAT offers a means of prioritising interventions, ensuring that those most vulnerable receive timely support.

Although the prevalence of burnout in Norway vis-à-vis the global landscape remains uncertain, ongoing BAT studies seek clarity on this matter. Designed to be culturally agnostic, the tool has demonstrated efficacy across genders and societal contexts. Professor Christensen notes that the online BAT tool serves educational and self-assessment purposes, empowering individuals to manage their well-being proactively.

More information: Leon T. De Beer et al, The psychometric properties of the Burnout Assessment Tool in Norway: A thorough investigation into construct-relevant multidimensionality, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12996

Journal information: Scandinavian Journal of Psychology Provided by Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Mindfulness in the workplace guards against stress and burnout

A recent study by researchers from the University of Nottingham’s Schools of Psychology and Medicine has unveiled compelling insights into the relationship between mindfulness and well-being in the digital workplace. The analysis, which involved survey responses from 142 employees, revealed that individuals who exhibit greater mindfulness in their digital work environments experience enhanced protection against stress, anxiety, and overload. Published in PLOS ONE, these findings shed light on the critical role of mindfulness in navigating the challenges of modern work settings.

Under the leadership of PhD student Elizabeth Marsh from the School of Psychology, the study aimed to explore the impact of digital technology on individuals’ health and identify strategies for mitigation. Marsh emphasised, “As work becomes increasingly mediated by digital technology, we sought to explore its implications on people’s health and identify potential strategies for mitigation. Our findings underscore the pressing need for embracing digital mindfulness and confidence as integral components of a healthy digital work-life balance in the 21st century.” This highlights the urgent call for organisations to promote mindfulness practices to foster employee well-being in the digital age, emphasising the need for immediate action.

Survey participants shared insights into their encounters with the adverse effects of the digital workplace, including stress, overload, anxiety, fear of missing out, and addiction, and how these factors influenced their health. The results unveiled that employees possessing greater digital confidence were less susceptible to digital workplace anxiety. Furthermore, those exhibiting higher levels of mindfulness demonstrated greater resilience against all identified adverse impacts. Insights from 14 interviews further illuminated how digital mindfulness can safeguard well-being, suggesting a promising avenue for intervention.

Dr. Alexa Spence, Associate Professor of Psychology, highlighted the role of digital workplace technologies in exacerbating employees’ perceptions of stress. “Digital workplace technologies such as e-mail, instant messaging, and mobile devices have been shown to contribute to employees’ perceptions of stress,” she noted. “The constant evolution of the digital workplace can exacerbate stress levels and potentially lead to burnout and deteriorating health.” This underscores the urgency for organisations to address the challenges posed by digital technologies and implement strategies to mitigate their adverse effects on employee well-being.

Mindfulness, characterised as a state of intentional and non-judgmental present-moment awareness, emerged as a crucial factor in mitigating the adverse effects of the digital workplace. Employees exhibiting higher levels of mindfulness were less susceptible to the negative impacts of digital work environments. Professor Elvira Perez Vallejos, a leading expert in Digital Technology for Mental Health, reiterated the implications of the research, stating, “Organisations must proactively address digital workplace hazards alongside other psychosocial and physical risks. Cultivating mindful awareness among employees engaging in digital work holds immense potential to significantly contribute to overall well-being.” This reiterates the potential of mindfulness interventions to enhance employee resilience and well-being in the digital age, instilling a sense of hope and optimism in the audience.

More information: Elizabeth Marsh et al, Mindfully and confidently digital: A mixed methods study on personal resources to mitigate the dark side of digital working, PLoS ONE. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295631

Journal information: PLoS ONE Provided by University of Nottingham